<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1964 Mustang road test</title>
	<atom:link href="http://iblogmustang.com/2009/12/05/1964-mustang-road-test/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://iblogmustang.com/2009/12/05/1964-mustang-road-test/</link>
	<description>Mustang geek. Searching for his own classic &#039;Stang</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 00:46:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ford Fusion</title>
		<link>http://iblogmustang.com/2009/12/05/1964-mustang-road-test/#comment-5007</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ford Fusion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 12:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://65mustang.wordpress.com/2009/12/05/1964-mustang-road-test/#comment-5007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mustangs have been a center of attraction since it was first launched by the Ford Motor company.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mustangs have been a center of attraction since it was first launched by the Ford Motor company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: onlymustangfords.com</title>
		<link>http://iblogmustang.com/2009/12/05/1964-mustang-road-test/#comment-4141</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[onlymustangfords.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 23:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://65mustang.wordpress.com/2009/12/05/1964-mustang-road-test/#comment-4141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If it was a 64 1/2 Mustang , it could have had a 289 in it. See:

http://www.onlymustangfords.com/1964-Mustang.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it was a 64 1/2 Mustang , it could have had a 289 in it. See:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.onlymustangfords.com/1964-Mustang.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.onlymustangfords.com/1964-Mustang.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

